YouTube Bans Red Ice, and Where You Can Still Find It

On 17 October 2019, YouTube banned the channel of Red Ice TV. The plain-talking right-leaning videos of Henrik Palmgren and Lana Lokteff were among the most refreshing sources of alternative media on that most censorious leftist platform.

Although gone from YouTube, you can still find free Red Ice content on BitChute, on Gab, on Telegram, on Instagram, and on DLive. You can find all Red Ice videos on Red Ice Members, including exclusive content for paid subscribers only.







Red Ice TV:

Red Ice Members:

Sample video cover image showing Henrik and Lana. The image is neither a video nor a link.

Richmond, Virginia, gun-rights protest 20 Jan 2020, Antifa planning false-flag provocation of police

There is a rumor that Antifa plans to create a false-flag (hoax) of a violent act, apparently by pro-gun rights groups who are protesting the recent Virginia gun-grabbing laws. According to unspecified sources, Antifa plans to arrive in Richmond on Monday and, while impersonating right-wing protesters, to shoot a firearm or start a riot or commit arson, or otherwise provoke the police and the FBI into reacting. (Or supply them with a pretext for reacting.) The Jewish-controlled mainstream media are already primed to support the hoax by assigning the blame to the right wing protesters.

Fake Quotes Abound! What Adolf Hitler Really Said about the Big Lie

A lot of fake quotes attributed to Adolf Hitler exist. Their creation was partly Allied War propaganda, and most of the rest were created by Jewish groups that apparently never tire of manufacturing them.

Among the more famous of these fake quotes has Hitler saying such things as these:

"If you repeat a lie enough, it becomes the truth."

"Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it."

Adolf Hitler never endorsed the use of Big-Lie propaganda. These fake quotes are the result of a gerrymandering and context-stripping of what Hitler said in MEIN KAMPF. I'll quote the relevant passages, from which the fake quotes were stitched together.

*** Excerpt from MEIN KAMPF, Chapter 3 ***

By far the greatest share in their political "education," which in this case is most aptly designated by the word "propaganda," falls to the account of the press. It is foremost in performing this "work of enlightenment" and thus represents a sort of school for grown-ups.

This instruction, however, is not in the hands of the state, but in the claws of forces which are in part very inferior.

In Vienna as a very young man I had the best opportunity to become acquainted with the owners and spiritual manufacturers of this machine for educating the masses.

At first I could not help but be amazed at how short a time it took this great evil power within the state to create a certain opinion even where it meant totally falsifying profound desires and views which surely existed among the public.

In a few days a ridiculous episode had become a significant state action, while, conversely, at the same time, vital problems fell a prey to public oblivion, or rather were simply filched from the memory and consciousness of the masses.

Thus, in the course of a few weeks it was possible to conjure up names out of the void, to associate them with incredible hopes on the part of the broad public, even to give them a popularity which the really great man often does not obtain his whole life long; names which a month before no one had even seen or heard of, while at the same time old and proved figures of political or other public life, though in the best of health, simply died as far as their fellow men were concerned or were heaped with such vile insults that their names soon threatened to become the symbol of some definite act of infamy or villainy.

We must study this vile Jewish technique of emptying garbage pails full of the vilest slanders and defamations from hundreds and hundreds of sources at once, suddenly and as if by magic, on the clean garments of honourable men, if we are fully to appreciate the entire menace represented by these scoundrels of the press.

There is absolutely nothing one of these spiritual robber-barons will not do to achieve his unsavoury aims.

He will poke into the most secret family affairs and not rest until his truffle searching instinct digs up some miserable incident which is calculated to finish off the unfortunate victim.

But if, after the most careful sniffing, absolutely nothing is found, either in the man's public or private life, one of these scoundrels simply seizes on slander, in the firm conviction that despite a thousand refutations something always sticks and, moreover, through the immediate and hundredfold repetition of his defamations by all his accomplices, any resistance on the part of the victim is in most cases utterly impossible; and it must be borne in mind that this rabble never acts out of motives which might seem credible or even understandable to the rest of humanity. God forbid!

While one of these scum is attacking his beloved fellow men in the most contemptible fashion, the octopus covers himself with a veritable cloud of respectability and unctuous phrases, prates about "journalistic duty" and suchlike lies, and even goes so far as to shoot off his mouth at committee meetings and congresses—that is, occasions where these pests are present in large numbers—about a very special variety of "honour," to wit, the journalistic variety, which the assembled rabble gravely and mutually confirm.

These scum manufacture more than three quarters of the so-called "public opinion," from whose foam the parliamentarian Aphrodite arises.

*** Excerpt from MEIN KAMPF, Chapter 10 ***

It required the whole bottomless falsehood of the Jews and their Marxist fighting organization to lay the blame for the collapse on that very man who alone, with superhuman energy and will power, tried to prevent the catastrophe he foresaw and save the nation from its time of deepest humiliation and disgrace.

By branding Ludendorff as guilty for the loss of the World War they took the weapon of moral right from the one dangerous accuser who could have risen against the traitors to the fatherland. In this they proceeded on the sound principle that the magnitude of a lie always contains a certain factor of credibility, since the great masses of the people in the very bottom of their hearts tend to be corrupted rather than consciously and purposely evil, and that, therefore, in view of the primitive simplicity of their minds they more easily fall a victim to a big lie than to a little one, since they themselves lie in little things, but would be ashamed of lies that were too big.

Such a falsehood will never enter their heads and they will not be able to believe in the possibility of such monstrous effrontery and infamous misrepresentation in others; yes, even when enlightened on the subject, they will long doubt and waver, and continue to accept at least one of these causes as true. Therefore, something of even the most insolent lie will always remain and stick — a fact which all the great lie-virtuosi and lying-clubs in this world know only too well and also make the most treacherous use of.

The foremost connoisseurs of this truth regarding the possibilities in the use of falsehood and slander have always been the Jews; for, after all, their whole existence is based on one single great lie, to wit, that they are a religious community while actually they are a race — and what a race! One of the greatest minds of humanity has nailed them forever as such in an eternally correct phrase of fundamental truth: he called them "the great masters of the lie." And anyone who does not recognize this or does not want to believe it will never in this world be able to help the truth to victory.

Stuff that Quora's Moderation Team doesn't like

Reposted here (and lots of other places) so that their censorship will not achieve its purpose.

Question: Homosexuality is never mentioned in the Koran, so why are homosexual acts considered a sin in Islam.

My Answer: I’m not sure. But the condemnation of homosexuality isn’t limited to Islam. It’s nearly universal in cultures predating the rise of Jewish communism. Indeed, it appears that one of the tactics used by Jewish communism is to normalize homosexuality and thus weaken the cultural strength of non-Jewish peoples.

Question: What is the purpose of racist people on Earth?

My Answer: To correct the egalitarian mistake made by mankind in the mid-20th century under the hypocritical influence of communist Jews, preferably before the human quality of the higher races is extinguished and civilization is transformed into a ten thousand year long dark age.

Question: Who was the first black woman to walk on the moon?

My Answer:

No blacks have ever been to the moon. Furthermore, spaceflight was originally a white achievement. That’s true both for the United States and for the Soviet Union, the two countries from which the first steps into outer space were made. The Asians, also a capable race, began to emulate the original white achievements about fifty years later.

But no black nation has ever launched anything into orbit. The only black people who have ever been to space were put there by white people. They were launched in historically white countries on rockets that were made by white rocket engineers. Indeed, the one man who came to the United States from Africa to start a rocket company was Elon Musk, who is completely white (as far as I can tell) on both sides of his family tree.

The fastest way to screw up a space program is to put blacks in charge of it. The most reliable way to cause a space colony to fail is to include blacks among the colonists. I hope that such things never happen. But, if they do, the responsible policy makers will soon see the error of their ways.

There was a futuristic dystopian science-fiction novel in which blacks came to power in the United States. They re-wrote the history books, so that students in grade school were taught that the first person on the moon was a black woman named Neela Armstrong. It might have been Hold Back This Day, but I’m not sure.

Question: What is the best way to kill off anti-Semitism?

My Answer: By getting rid of the Jews. Presto! No more antisemitism. And the world will enjoy a sharp decrease in usury, which will boost the economic health of every country, and a very sharp decline in international sex-slave trafficking and pedophile prostitution.

Question: Are lesbians and gays attracted to transgender people?

My Answer: Hell, no. One of the biggest sources of division on the Left is that lesbians don’t recognize male-to-female transgenders as real women. And I can certainly understand why. Let’s say that you’re a woman who likes to have sex with other women, and this THING comes along and says that IT is a “woman” who’d like to have sex with you. IT takes ITS pants off, and there’s a penis! “Not to worry,” says the THING. “It only means that I don’t need to bother with a strap-on dildo.” What do you think the lesbian is going to do? Run like the wind. After all, how can a lesbian possibly tell the difference between a penis-wielding male-to-female transgender from an ordinary heterosexual man who is a clever liar, hoping to score an amusing lay with a cute lesbian?

Question: Why do racists and white supremacy groups hate Jewish people?

My Answer: Because they are aware of the harm that Jews do, such as corrupt high finance with usury; corrupt governments with bribes and blackmail; corrupt culture with sexual promiscuity, pornography, perversions, pedophilia, rap “music” and “modern art”; corrupt society with materialism, with contempt for the natural, nuclear family, and with endless mockery of tradition, etc. A lot of people know that something is badly wrong with Western civilization, that it is sick. They mostly aren’t yet aware that the Jews are the germs who caused the disease.

Question: Is it possible to convert racist people into non-racist people?

My Answer: Hasn’t it ever occurred to you that THEY might be RIGHT and that YOU might be WRONG?

If the moon fell straight down, how long would it take to hit Earth?

If you removed all of the moon's transverse velocity when the moon reached its aphelion, leaving the moon momentarily stationary with respect to Earth, then the moon and Earth would indeed fall together. How long would it take?

Two bodies having a total mass M (i.e., M = M₁ + M₂) are initially at rest, separated by a distance d, in vacuum, and isolated from all forces except their mutual gravitational attraction. Find the time elapsed from the initial moment to the moment at which the separation is r, such that 0≤r≤d.

The problem involves the conservation of energy in a gravity dominated physical system, so we begin with the Vis Viva equation, solved for the speed in orbit:

v = √[GM(2/r − 1/a)]

where G = 6.6743e-11 m³ kg⁻¹ sec⁻²

The eccentricity of a plunge orbit is one, just as it is for a parabolic orbit. Why? Because for an elliptical orbit,

e = √(1 − b²/a²)

where b is the length of the semiminor axis, and a is the length of the semimajor axis. As b→0, the elliptical orbit becomes a plunge orbit, and e→1.

The apoapsis separation of M₁ and M₂ is therefore twice the semimajor axis.

e = 1
d = a(1+e)
d = 2a
a = d/2

And, since the angular momentum in a plunge orbit is zero, all of the motion therein is radial, and so

v = ∂r/∂t

Therefore, the Vis Viva equation can be rewritten as

∂r/∂t = √[2GM(1/r − 1/d)]

which is a non-linear differential equation with variables separable. We shall integrate both sides over the entire course of the fall, from the apoapsis of the plunge orbit to contact, assuming that both M₁ and M₂ are point masses.

∫(t₀,tᵢ) ∂t = − ∫(rᵢ,d) { ∂r / √[2GM(1/r − 1/d)] }

The minus sign appears because the actual motion in the plunge orbit begins at d and ends at rᵢ, and I flipped those limits. However, hereafter I'll omit the limits and treat the indefinite integral.

tᵢ−t₀ = −√[d/(2GM)] ∫ ∂r/√(d/r−1)

We make this substitution:

u = √(d/r−1)

∂u/∂r = −½ d r⁻²/√(d/r−1)

r = d/(u²+1)

∂r = (−2d) u [∂u/(u²+1)²]

Plugging them in, we get

t−t₀ = 2d √[d/(2GM)] ∫ ∂u/(u²+1)²

Integrating by parts,

t−t₀ = 2d √[d/(2GM)] { ½ ∫ [∂u/(u²+1)] + ½ u/(u²+1) }

t−t₀ = d √[d/(2GM)] { u/(u²+1) + ∫ [∂u/(u²+1)] }

We notice an integral-trigonometric identity.

∫ ∂u/(u²+1) = arctan u


t−t₀ = d √[d/(2GM)] { u/(u²+1) + arctan u }

Reversing the substitution,

t−t₀ = d √[d/(2GM)] { √(d/r−1)/[(d/r−1)+1] + arctan √(d/r−1) }

After simplification, we get as the general solution for the time to fall in a plunge orbit:

tᵢ−t₀ = √[d/(2GM)] { √(rᵢd−rᵢ²) + d arctan √(d/rᵢ−1) }

In the case where the motion in a plunge orbit begins at the apoapsis and ends in contact (assuming point masses),

rᵢ = 0

tᵢ−t₀ = π √[d³/(8GM)]

When determining the time to fall from r₁ to r₂, such that d>r₁>r₂>0,

t₂−t₁ = (t₂−t₀) − (t₁−t₀)

Now let's consider what happens when we let the moon drop straight down from its apogee to first contact between the two bodies, allowing them to keep their actual size and shape.

d = 405,503,560 meters

r₁ = 8,108,400 meters

M = 6.0483e+24 kilograms

t₁−t₀ = 450871.423 seconds = 125.242062 hours

Now let's run the fall again, from apogee to center-to-center contact, assuming that Earth and moon are both point masses.

r₂ = 0

t₂−t₀ = 451416.430 seconds = 125.393453 hours

The difference is about 9 minutes and 5 seconds.

The Threat to the World Isn't Nazism; It's Marxism

It might be the greatest leftist hoax so far. Twenty-five people are known to be dead, thousands of homes have been destroyed, and 32,400 square miles of forest has burned.

Several months ago, wildfires began to spread across Australia. They multiplied and grew until most parts of the country was threatened with being burned up. The problem with the wildfires was exacerbated by the fact that environmentalists had succeeded in having laws passed that forbade private citizens from doing controlled burns to create fire-breaks.

Then, after enough underbrush had grown to ensure that a fire, once started, could not be stopped, the leftists struck, travelling around starting the fires that are still burning now.

What was their motive? The leftists wanted to have something big to blame climate change for. No sooner had the Australian fires become international news than celebrities who endorse leftist politics began saying things like "Make no mistake, the tragedy unfolding in Australia is climate-change based."

Nope. It's based on arson and on the Marxist fondness for creating politically motivated hoaxes. 187 people have been arrested so far in connecting with starting the fires. There may be hundreds more arsonists who have not yet been identified by the police.

The threat to the world isn't Nazism; it's Marxism. The Left is evil. The Right is right, which is offensive to people on the Left who are ill-equipped to face reality on their own, who are not prepared to be judged according to their worth.

Socialism and Capitalism: Why Neither Works (For Long)

Civilization, in general, is about the pursuit of survival, truth, and beauty. Economic activity, earning a living, is how you pursue survival. Survival is not guaranteed to be interesting, or fulfilling. You do it because you want to remain alive. Survival activity can become "boring" especially after you have been, for a long time, repetitively doing what has worked in the past.

Socialism has a persistent failure mode called "the tragedy of the commons," which was described well by the economist Garrett Harden. There is, apparently, no way for socialism to escape it. If ten shepherds, keeping ten sheep apiece, are using a pasture in which grows just enough grass for 100 sheep to graze, then it will occur to each of the shepherds that he can boost his profits by 10% by cheatingly owning an eleventh sheep. If only one shepherd cheated, then the system might be able to endure. But, no, ALL of the shepherds will have the same idea, and the pasture will become over-grazed, and all of the grass will be gone, and then all of the sheep will die. That's how the tragedy of the commons works.

You can test this yourself. All you need to do is buy 100 brand-new, best-selling novels and put them on a store shelf. Then you announce to the public that the book on that shelf are a commons, where the only rule is "leave a book before taking a book." Everybody engaging with your socialist book-swap will want to take away at least a little better than he brought, so that, over time, the books remaining on your shelf become ever more tattered in physical condition and ever less desirable in terms of subject matter. After a month, you will be left with junk that nobody wants. That, too, is how the tragedy of the commons works.

But capitalism has a problem, too. When the apologists for capitalism extol the virtues thereof, the economic system of which they speak is laissez-faire capitalism, or free market capitalism. Free market capitalism is a wonderful economic system. It rewards innovation, hard work, smart work, risk-taking, and other virtues. The failure mode of free market capitalism arrives when the richest capitalists become so rich that they can "buy the law," corrupt the government with bribes or with financial gifts that might as well be bribes, and thereby recruit the coercive powers of the state to their own purposes. When that happens, you no longer have free-market capitalism, but state-sponsored corporate capitalism, which is an entirely different economic system.

In free market capitalism, nobody is "too big to fail." In state-sponsored corporate capitalism, the corporations who have a number of top politicians in their pockets are treated as if they were Too Big To Fail, and the taxpayers are often forced to bail out corporations whose executives made foolish or venial choices. That's when capitalism exhibits the characteristic widening of the gap between the haves and the have-nots, the 1% versus the 99%, and the Marxists suddenly have sympathetic ears for their socialist nonsense. (Marxism is NOT the "cure" for capitalism gone bad because it has a well-known failure mode of its own, that being the aforesaid Tragedy of the Commons.)

The failure mode of free market capitalism is exactly as persistent as is the failure mode of socialism. You can always depend on capitalists to corrupt the government to suit their own ends when they gain the power to do so. Why? Because all their lives these same capitalists have been ruthlessly pursuing their selfish interests in the free market phase of capitalism. Why would anyone expect them suddenly to acquire altruistic morals after they cross the threshold of being able to lobby effectively for laws that protect their interests at the expense of others? They won't become altruistic. They will persist in their selfish habits. And the free market economy will transform, every time, into state-sponsored corporate capitalism.

Something the Jews do right, which we should likewise do

I criticize Israel a lot. But there's one thing the Israelis do well. They order their country for their own empowerment, benefit, security, and prospects. True, the Israeli government is a warmongering pack of criminal liars who scheme to take over the lands of neighboring countries and who dupe or corrupt the leaders of Western nations into forking over treasure and into fighting wars for them. But all their iniquities are aimed at giving advantage to the Jewish people, who, being a tiny minority of the world's population, might not be able to get those advantages openly and honestly.

We whites don't need to engage in corruption and deceit to bring about similar empowerment, benefits, security, and prospects. We can do it openly and honestly. Can. But we don't. Jewish propaganda — most leftist and globalist propaganda is Jewish in origin — has us divided against ourselves. It has inculcated many of us, especially white youth, a false conception of history, a false conception of morality, a false conception of nature, and so on, so that our first battle is to convert them back to reality, to true history, and to a proper morality.

Reality includes the idea that there is no universal morality. (Quite as much as there is no absolute time, no privileged frame of reference, in physics.)

True history involves a lot of antisemitic stuff that isn't taught in schools.

A proper morality always has, as its highest value, the survival of one's own race, and always has, as its second highest value, truth and a reliable means by which to find it.

A post deleted by YouTube from a video by Tim Pool

No Tim. You're wrong about poverty causing crime and about everyone being the same under the skin. The idea that poverty causes crime sounds plausible at first. You imagine the poor people, seeking the bare necessities of life, commit crimes because they have no other recourse. But not every theory that sounds plausible turns out to be correct.

If poverty caused crime, then there would be a strong correlation between crime rates and socio-economic status, but no correlation at all between crime rates and race. Why? Because if "everyone" is the same under the skin, if race doesn't matter, then different racial groups at the same socio-economic level would have the same crime rates. And they don't. There is an even stronger correlation between race and crime than there is between poverty and crime, and the latter correlation is probably a reflection of the former one.

Blacks and whites simply aren't the same kind of creature. Racial differences don't end at skin color. The go on to include brain size, IQ, and typical patterns of behavior. And, when you think about it, this is only what should be expected. Nature, which created all of the inherited differences between the races, was never under any compulsion (or compunction) to limit those differences to the purely cosmetic ones that liberals like yourself don't seem to mind (e.g. skin color). It would be pure wishful thinking to imagine that nature was somehow aware of leftist wishes in the matter and carefully refrained from allowing any racial differences of which liberals might disapprove.

You should check the crime statistics at the federal and state level. You'll see that your claims regarding no racial correlation are false.

This comment was deleted once before, so I'm going to make a copy of it and post it on Gab, VNN, my blog, and elsewhere.

Astrophysics Challenge Questions

1. What is the separation at which an object in an elliptical orbit has its average speed, relative to the primary object?

Find a general expression for the separation between two gravitationally bound masses, in elliptical orbits around a common center of mass, when they have their average speed relative to each other.

(Hint: it isn't the length of the semimajor axis.)

2. A spaceship travelling in an unoccupied part of Earth's orbit changes its velocity in order to make a rendezvous with Vesta. Its position vector in heliocentric ecliptic coordinates for the departure burn is

x₁ = −0.09273216409680376 AU
y₁ = +0.9790543154949219 AU
z₁ = 0.0

The position of the rocket at the time of arrival is

x₂ = −0.1329822455259632 AU
y₂ = −2.149578487312375 AU
z₂ = +0.08086760107675305 AU

Assume that the transfer orbit has its aphelion at the arrival position (where it intercepts Vesta) and calculate the eccentricity and the semimajor axis of the transfer orbit.

3. A starship is in an elliptical orbit in the equatorial plane of an exoplanet. The navigator makes the following observations:

The equatorial angular diameter at periapsis is 16.3060482°
The equatorial angular diameter at apoapsis is 12.0634564°
The polar angular diameter at periapsis is 16.2567986°
The polar angular diameter at apoapsis is 12.0271323°
The period of orbit is 108,000 seconds.
The altitude above surface of the exoplanet at periapsis is 52,568,218 meters.

Find the exoplanet's mass.

4. Two bodies having a total mass M (i.e., M=M₁+M₂) are initially at rest, separated by a distance d, in vacuum, and isolated from all forces except their mutual gravitational attraction.

4a. Find the time elapsed for the entire fall from the initial moment to contact.

4b. Find the time elapsed from the initial moment to the moment at which the separation is r, such that r is strictly between zero and d.

4c. Find the time elapsed beginning the instant at which the separation is d/2 and ending when the separation is d/3.

4d. Find the fraction of the initial separation that is closed in half of the amount of time required for the entire fall to contact (assuming point masses).

5. The observed Doppler shift of a star indicates an amplitude in radial velocity of 0.3 meters per second. The astrophysicists estimate, using the observable stellar parameters (luminosity and effective temperature) that the star's mass is 0.5 solar masses. The variation in the radial velocity has a period of 44 days.

5a. What is the mass of the exoplanet causing the star to exhibit that Doppler shift, assuming that the star has only one planet?

5b. What is the exoplanet's orbital radius, assuming that its orbit around the star is circular?